SC refuses to stall LIC IPO, issues notice on pleas against LIC Act changes | Latest News India

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to intervene with the allocation of Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) shares by an Initial Public Offer (IPO) even because it issued a notice on petitions difficult the validity of the amendments to the LIC Act saying it couldn’t have been executed by means of a money invoice.

A bench of justices Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Surya Kant and PS Narasimha issued the notice on separate petitions filed by LIC policyholders against the modification to Section 28 of the LIC Act. The character of the company was modified from a mutual profit society to a joint-stock company by the change.

The petitioners failed to get aid from the Madras and Bombay excessive courts. They approached the highest court docket in search of interim instructions to keep the allocation of shares by IPO. The petitioners stated the allocation would take away the dividend beforehand out there to policyholders on the excess earned on the LIC funds.

The high court docket refused any interim aid. It famous the IPO opened for anchor buyers on May 2 and for most of the people on May 4. The court docket stated the IPO closed on May 9. “73 lakh applicants in India and abroad have subscribed to the IPO,” the bench stated.

The Centre argued against any interim order because the shares will probably be open for buying and selling subsequent week. Additional solicitor basic N Venkatraman, showing for the Centre, stated, “Any order at this stage will send completely wrong signals in the market at the time of allotment. Please do not do it. 73 lakh bank accounts are blocked today. It will start trading from May 17.”

Venkatraman identified that each the Madras and Bombay excessive courts didn’t move any interim aid because the petitioners failed to justify their proper, both below the coverage holding contract or any statutory proper below the LIC Act, to declare applicable dividend over the excess LIC funds. “The contract gives them no right to get 95% of the non-participating shareholders’ surplus,” he stated. “This petition is simply to scare investors and play spoilsport by coming in at the last minute.”

He instructed the court docket the Finance Act for the modification was handed in March 2021 nearly 15 months again and even the current appeals had been filed early this month regardless of the orders being handed by the excessive courts.

Senior advocate Indira Jaising, showing for one of many petitioners stated, “This petition cannot be treated by the government so frivolously by saying the petitioners have delayed. An amount of 523 lakh crore is sought to be diverted from policyholders to shareholders. When you change the personality of LIC, you have a duty towards the policyholders. The government is just a trustee on behalf of the policyholders.”

As the bench was inclined to difficulty the notice, senior advocates Shyam Divan and Anitha Shenoy, showing for the remaining two petitioners, didn’t make submissions. The court docket directed the Centre to file its response in eight weeks because the matter will now be listed earlier than a Constitution Bench.

Back to top button